<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Reasoning | Sara Candussio</title><link>https://saracandussio.github.io/tags/reasoning/</link><atom:link href="https://saracandussio.github.io/tags/reasoning/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><description>Reasoning</description><generator>Hugo Blox Builder (https://hugoblox.com)</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Demystifying Entropy-based Selection for Chain-of-Thought Compression in Large Reasoning Models</title><link>https://saracandussio.github.io/publication/demystifying-entropy/</link><pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://saracandussio.github.io/publication/demystifying-entropy/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="key-findings">Key findings&lt;/h2>
&lt;ul>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Entropy is no better than chance for sentences.&lt;/strong> Across all models, model sizes and benchmarks, neither low- nor high-entropy sentence selection reliably outperforms random pruning.&lt;/li>
&lt;/ul>
&lt;p>
&lt;figure >
&lt;div class="flex justify-center ">
&lt;div class="w-100" >&lt;img alt="Random sentence selection retains more of the full-trace accuracy than either entropy-based selector (gpt-oss-20b, AIME25)." srcset="
/publication/demystifying-entropy/fig-sentence-level_hu11885784096641423651.webp 400w,
/publication/demystifying-entropy/fig-sentence-level_hu4138379656291788349.webp 760w,
/publication/demystifying-entropy/fig-sentence-level_hu9529656548894662923.webp 1200w"
src="https://saracandussio.github.io/publication/demystifying-entropy/fig-sentence-level_hu11885784096641423651.webp"
width="760"
height="530"
loading="lazy" data-zoomable />&lt;/div>
&lt;/div>&lt;/figure>
&lt;/p>
&lt;ul>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>The token-level advantage is about numbers, not entropy.&lt;/strong> Low-entropy tokens look useful only on math tasks, because digits naturally have low entropy and carry the key content. Once numbers are removed, low-entropy selection falls below random.&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Reasoning content is spread out.&lt;/strong> With activation patching, keeping only about 9% of the trace (the numeric tokens) is enough to retain 90% of full-trace accuracy on AIME25. Without patching, the same tokens never get there.&lt;/li>
&lt;/ul>
&lt;p>
&lt;figure >
&lt;div class="flex justify-center ">
&lt;div class="w-100" >&lt;img alt="Share of the original CoT tokens needed to recover 90% of full-trace accuracy on AIME25, with and without activation patching." srcset="
/publication/demystifying-entropy/fig-patching-budget_hu598794805401873164.webp 400w,
/publication/demystifying-entropy/fig-patching-budget_hu16616147589002922427.webp 760w,
/publication/demystifying-entropy/fig-patching-budget_hu12001123696388427436.webp 1200w"
src="https://saracandussio.github.io/publication/demystifying-entropy/fig-patching-budget_hu598794805401873164.webp"
width="760"
height="434"
loading="lazy" data-zoomable />&lt;/div>
&lt;/div>&lt;/figure>
&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>